I've been saving things headed for the recycling bin for a photo opp. Besides being amazed and sorta pissed at how much stuff we simply discard after one use, I'm interested in the industrial design and forms inherent in our throw away packaging. I like the x-ray kind of quality to these from being entirely backlit. More either here and/or on my website soon.
5.31.2011
Recycling
Labels: photography
Advertising Photography,
Boston,
Boston Photographer,
Bruce Peterson,
Commercial Photography,
Still Life Photography
5.18.2011
Labels: photography
Advertising Photography,
Boston,
Boston Photographer,
Bruce Peterson,
Commercial Photography,
Still Life Photography
5.06.2011
Details
I've long been intrigued by the engineering in packaging that delivers the products that we use. Simple everyday stuff. I've been collecting my own recycling for a couple months and started examining some of it. I like to shoot things as I find them, something about the chance element of how it arrived to me makes it precious and needs to be preserved. It's about looking and lighting, for me that's pure photography.
One thing worth mentioning as it might not be apparent on the web: These objects are tack sharp front to back, you can see every little thread, piece of lint, fuzz, etc. Those kinds of details are interesting to me.
Tech Talk: To get these completely in focus requires several exposures, front focus, mid focus and back focus. When you change the focus, the image size changes - as you back focus the image gets smaller, at this size, around 1.5%. We used to manually adjust and resize each exposure, it's a tedious chore. Thankfully I found some software that will do it automatically, and it works well most of the time. I think that's pretty amazing that someone could write an algorithm to find the sharp detail in a series of different exposures, separate that detail from the soft areas, and then resize them to create one single sharp image.
Another tech detail about my process: I shoot with a multi-shot back. Meaning, to create a digital file it's sampled 4 times. There are 4 exposures recorded to create a single image. A brief explanation: Imagine a grid with 39 million pixels, dots. To create color information there is an RGB filter grid in front of those pixels. Imagine a square that has a red, green, blue and another green filter, each the size of one pixel, then that grid is repeated to cover the entire sensor area. When you photograph something that is predominately say, blue - the red and green pixels don't record much, if any, information. The software has to interpolate what colors those red and green pixels are based on what's being recorded around them. There is software interpolation of the color and detail, that's the way all single shot CCD chips work. With multi-shot technology that filter grid is shifted one pixel at a time so each quadrant on the grid is sampled accurately. Since these is no software interpolation of the color and detail, the digital files are much smoother and have a much higher level of detail. A problem is the subject can't move, when we're shooting everyone in the shooting area has stay completely still. With a subject like these, the slightest breeze causes movement in the subject. It can be a patient process, but I feel worth it as the detail really is incredible.
Labels: photography
Advertising Photography,
Boston,
Boston Photographer,
Bruce Peterson,
Commercial Photography,
Still Life Photography
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)